Table of Contents
1.
Introduction
(2)
2.
Methodology
(3)
3.
Analysis
and Presentation of Findings (4)
4.
Discussion
of Findings (6)
5.
Conclusion
(8)
6.
Bibliography
7.
Appendix
I.
Interview
questions
II.
Research
consent forms
III.
Plagiarism Declaration
1.
Introduction
According to Long
and Wall Ethnography is “the method where
the researcher attempts to enter into the culture or way of life of a particular group and provide an account
of its meaning and activities from inside, based in what they mean to members
of that culture” (Long and Wall 2012).
The author would also like to point out that it is often the case, surface or
excess information turns out to be the most significant (May, 2011). This form of
ethnographic analysis will involve that author familiarising himself with the
information from the study in an effort to understand the culture of the family
observed (Lewin and Somckh, 2011). There are
however many issues associated with carrying out an ethnographic study such as
how can the author observe or ever know the extent to which his presence had with the Mullins family.
Therefore the author can only assume how the Mullins Family would view the “Voice of Ireland”. The author also
believes that despite his modest research experience, ethnography research
methods can be successfully carried out if he has a clear idea of what he is
going to seek (Davis, 2007) . The aims and objectives
set out for the ethnographic study are:
1. To
observe and record rituals they carryout in preparation for viewing.
2. To
observe the participants body language as they view the programme.
3. To
observe and record their reactions to the contents of the programme.
4. To
examine reasons behind why they chose to look at the programme.
Evaluation of the main points of this ethnographic
study will show that the members of the Mullins family all interpret and
interact with television differently.
2.
Methodology
An Ethnography
study begins with the view that the shaped cultural meanings of the group are
crucial to understanding its behaviour. The author is also aware that his main task in
the process is to uncover this meaning. Firstly the author had to find a family
or a group within the locality to take part in the ethnography study. Once the
author found a suitable group contact was made with the family on Friday the
7th of February. When the author first made contact with the family it proved
unsuccessful. Fortunately this was the only issue that arose during the process
of the study. When the author made contact the following day with Mrs Bernadette
Mullins not only did she agree to take part in the study she was also very
positive about the study. A suitable
time was arranged between the author and the family concerned. They informed
the author that the programme they would be watching was The Voice of Ireland. This particular programme was broadcasted on
R..T.E One on Sunday the 9th of February at 6.30 pm. Since the Mullins
family agreed to take part in ethnographic study they will be subsequently
studied in their natural environment. The author was also aware that he will
have to attempt to blend into the surroundings. The Voice of Ireland is a reality singing competition programme which is part of the voice franchise. Every week
people perform in front of judges with emphasises placed on the voice and not
appearance. This is done by the fact that the judges cannot see the contestant
till they hit the buzzer to turn their chair around, hence why it is called the
blind audition. In preparation for the study the researcher designed interview
questions. The author also used a generic research consent form given to him by
a lecturer. The author prepared all the necessary technologies in advance of
the ethnography study, and recorded all interviews on his smart phone. The
author arrived at the Mullins house hold ahead of schedule to prepare himself
and also observe the rituals that took place before settling down to watch the
programme. Before the programme had started the author distributed the research
consent form to each individual and gave a brief synopses as to what the
research is all about. The author was also committed to drafting the central ideas
that emerged from the moment he started the observation (Davis, 2007). Once the
programme had started and the research consent forms returned the author began
the observation. When the programme had concluded the researcher gave a list of
six questions to each participant to read and fully understand what was being
asked of them, time was also given to the participants if they had any quires
about the questions. The author then proceeded to interview
each participant individually. Closure of an ethnographic study is done by
recognising the point at which nothing new about the groups cultural
significance is being learned. Once all the interviews were completed the
author thanked the participants for taking part in the study. The participants
were rewarded by the researcher for taking part in the study.
3.Analysis and presentation of
findings
The author has
decided to interpret the data and interviews from the study under the following
themes/categories.
·
Rituals
·
Programme genre
·
Interactions
·
Influences
3.1 Rituals
The author believed
it was important to take account of what rituals the subject had before
watching their chosen programme. In an effort to take this into account the
author arrived ahead of schedule and observed the rituals that took place
before the programme had commenced. The author observed one of the subjects
carrying out housework such as feeding the dog. Interestingly the others were
in place and ready to watch the programme while the work was being carried out.
In the interview all four participants were asked the question “what rituals do
you have before looking at your chosen programme”. Bernie Mullins replied
“having all the house work done, I like having the footstool out and the fire
lit”. It is interesting to note that all the replies were in no way similar and
in fact greatly differed. For example John Mullins Junior replied “I usually
make myself a cup of coffee” not making any reference to house work.
3.2 Programme Genre
The author was of
the belief that in relation to the ethnographic study being carried out it was
important to take account of the programme genre. Owing to the nature of the
programme being viewed, one would be right to assume that all those viewing
would have some interest in music. However on observation of the participant’s
body language, it was clear to the author that this kind of programme genre did
not interest all participants. When John Senior was asked in the interview “how
did you decide to watch this programme” he replied “my family chose for me”.
This answer could give some explanation why he left for a short period not
waiting for an ad break. The author was also fascinated by the fact how two of
the participants made comparisons between the Irish programme and its English
counterpart. The author also observed how one participant was constantly on her
mobile. When the author asked this participant what programme she watched on a
regular basis she replied “Modern Family, Coronation Street, Criminal Minds”,
none of which are in a similar category to the “Voice of Ireland”. It was interesting
how when asked only one participant said she watched the voice on a regular
basis. The author can conclude not only from the interview but also observation
that not every participant had an active interest in reality music programmes
such as the “Voice of Ireland”.
3.3 Interaction
The author
believed that it was important that he observed and took account of the
interactions that took place during the ethnographic study. The author observed
on many occasions throughout the process participants conferred with each other
on certain elements of the programme. For example Grannie and Bernie Mullins
compared with each other on the standard of performance given and the verdict
given by the judging panel. It was also interesting how one of the participants
who indicated he did not have a choice in the selection of the programme being
watched, was constantly on his phone giving
little attention to the programme being viewed. The point was previously made
that the “Voice of Ireland” is part of a franchise, with a similar programme
being broadcasted in the U.K. The author was fascinated how while the participants
were watching the programme they were
making comparisons with The Voice U.K.
Participants made comparisons mostly on the standard of the auditions and
judging panel. The author concludes that if individuals are constantly on their
phone it would be very difficult for them to take in fully what is going on in
the programme. It is worth considering that this kind of interaction could be
mirrored across the country.
3.4 Influences
During the
ethnographic study the author wanted to establish what influences if any
encouraged the participants to view the “Voice of Ireland”. In the interview
that took place after the programme concluded all the participants were asked
the question “how did you decide to watch this programme”. The answer each
participant gave varied greatly. Interestingly only two participants said they
watched the “Voice of Ireland” on a regular basis while the other participants
claimed not to have any say in the choice of programme viewed by the family.
This is hardly surprising owing to the body language displayed by some of the
participants during the course of the programme. The author believes that it is
worth pointing out that this is not an isolated issue and could easily be
mirrored in families throughout the country.
4
Discussion
of Findings.
The author can
conclude that in light of carrying out the research that an ethnographic study is
likely to be unfolding study rather than pre-stretched. He is also now more
aware that it takes time to gain access to the deeper and most important levels
of reality. The author also wishes to acknowledge that the findings that may
emerge in research will differ from anyone else’s this could be in part due to
his own psychological perceptions (Davis, 2007) .
4.1 Rituals
The author can
conclude that as a result of carrying out the media ethnographic study with the
Mullins family the rituals carried by out by each individual member differed
greatly. For example one of the younger members of the family said having her
phone beside her whereas another member of the family would rather have the fire lighting before she
settled down to watch the “Voice of
Ireland”
4.2 Programme Genres
The author
observed from the body language of some of the participants that not all
favoured the choice of programme. In the interview after the programme had
concluded only two participants favoured the music reality television genre.
4.3 Interactions
During the course
of the authors observation he noticed how only two participants actively
discussed the programme content. It was also observed that the younger
participants were interacting with other technologies such as mobile phones.
4.4.Influences
What influences
people to watch a particular programme is a question that many television
executives ask themselves. In the interviews two participants claimed they were
given no choice in the programme being viewed. When asked how did you decide to
watch this programme, one participant replied “my family chose for me”.
5.Conclusion
In conclusion the
author is of the belief that while there are many problems associated with
carrying out an ethnographic study, it is perhaps the most accurate way to
sample an audiences view on a programme. The author is also of the belief that
one of the main limitations of this kind of study is the possibility that the
participants are putting on an act and not behaving as usual, when a researcher
is not present.
Bibliography
Davis, M. B. (2007). Doing a Succesful Research
Project. Hampsire: Palgrave Macmillian .
Lewin, B. S. (2011). Theory and Methods in Social
Research . Sage Condron .
May, T. (2011). Social Reaserch Issues Methods snd
Process . Open University Press .
Paul Long, T. W. (2012). Media Studies Texts,
Production, Context 2nd Edition . Essex: Pearson Education Limited .
Appendices
Media
audience ethnographic research questionnaire
My name is Patrick Jordan I
am currently in my final year of studies for a B.A Honours level 8 degree in
Media and Public Relations at IT Carlow. As part of my final year of studies I
have to complete an ethnographic study of an audience. This research entails
fieldwork that will include observation and in depth interviews with members of
an audience.
1.
How did you decide to watch this programme?
2.
Do you watch other programme similar
to this?
3.
Can you give an example of other
programmes you watch on a regular basis?
4.
Does the choice of programmes on the
television have an impact on what you watch?
5.
Has the recent upgrade to Saorview
made any difference to your viewing of television?
6.
What rituals do you have when looking at a
television programme.?
RESEARCH
CONSENT FORM
My name is Patrick Jordan I
am currently in my final year of studies for a B.A Honours level 8 degree in
Media and Public Relations at IT Carlow. As part of my final year of studies I
have to complete an ethnographic study of an audience. This research entails
fieldwork that will include observation and in depth interviews with members of
an audience.
|
Please tick the Box |
||
1.
|
|
||
2.
I understand that my participation is
voluntary and that I
am free to withdraw at any time, without giving
reason.
|
|
||
3. I agree to
take part in the above study.
|
|
||
4. I agree to the study being audio recorded
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Signature Date Phone Number
Signature Date
Phone Number
No comments:
Post a Comment